Cryptobootsology

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Patterson Film




Deathbed Confession?

The most commonly heard false fact about the Patterson footage:

"The guy who got the footage admitted on his deathbed that he faked it."

This is not true. This is a mixup. Here's how the mixup started.

The man who obtained the most well known photo of the Loch Ness monster (not bigfoot) admitted on his deathbed that he faked that photo.

The story of his confession popped up in newspaper headlines around the world. The story didn't last long as a news item, but every new agency, in every country, on every continent, ran the story.

The story mutated in the press, from a crypto story about one photo from Loch Ness being debunked, to "Mystery of Loch Ness Finally Solved."

Around the country and around the world people were interested to hear that the famous monster mystery was solved, because the most famous monster photo had been debunked.

Frame 352 from the Patterson footage is the most famous, purportedly authentic, "monster" photo known to most Americans. They are more familiar with that than with the 1930's photo from Loch Ness.

This was the foundation for some of the confusion. It got worse later.

The Patterson footage was mistakenly associated with a "deathbed confession" related to a famous "monster" mystery.

The Loch Ness deathbed confession story grabbed such big headlines, it was inevitable that someone would try the same formula down the line. It only took a few more years.

The heirs of a man named Ray Wallace initially reported his "deathbed confession" about faking the first famous bigfoot tracks in Northern California.

Ray Wallace left behind a few pairs of wooden feet for making fake tracks. He would sell plaster casts of fake tracks at his roadside tourist shop.

His heirs later recanted the "deathbed confession" part of the story, and instead said they "just know he started the whole thing."

The initial "deathbed confession" element helpd get the story onto the AP Wire. It became "The Father of Bigfoot Dies".

The story was circulated word-of-mouth and similarly transformed into a story about the Patterson footage.

The Patterson still images are the most famous images associated with bigfoots.

The Wallace story had to do with the most famous track casts.

The track casts were obtained 10 years before the Patterson footage.

The Wallace story didn't have anything to do with the Patterson footage.


Wallace's heirs were well aware that the Loch Ness "deathbed confession" made world headlines years earlier. They were just taking advantage of an opportunity.

Ray Wallace did not start the bigfoot mystery. He was not involved in the first track finds either. Graphic evidence disproves the claims of Ray's opportunistic heirs.

For more info on the Wallace family, click here.

The man who obtained the Patterson footage, Roger Patterson, died of cancer in the early 1970's. He was emphatic to the end that he filmed a real animal in October 1967.

The man who was with Patterson at the time, Bob Gimlin, is still alive. He is also adamant that it was a real animal.


If you chat about the bigfoot subject with a group of people, someone will jump in and claim they heard "the guy who got that famous footage admitted before he died that he faked it."

Try it sometime.

There are no written sources whatsoever suggesting Patterson admitted to a hoax on his deathbed. No one in his family has ever claimed that Roger admitted to a hoax before his death. All of the assertions in that regard began circulating after the Loch Ness story came out.

This mixup story has become an urban legend.

The 1996 Memorial Day Footage

Jacobs Photo - Pennsylvania, 9/16/2007

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Freeman Bigfoot Footage

Monday, June 04, 2007

Sea Monster

Sunday, June 03, 2007

El Chupacabra


This one freaks me out!

The Redwoods Bigfoot Film

Yeti Video "The Snow Walker"

Saturday, June 02, 2007

Lochness Monster Footage

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Australian Wildman: The Yowie

This picture was taken in Springbrook QLD. Dean is inspecting a stick formation found against the door of a hut his team sleeps in right in the middle of an active area. This location is deep inthe middle of rain forest on private property with no public access. The owner of the propertyswears that there is no chance anyone could have been on his property without his knowledge. This particular Yowie also drives hundreds of sticks into the ground.

Megamouth Shark

In 1976, the US navy caught this unknown species of shark. The 1 ton shark was dubbed "Mega Mouth" due to it's rather unique jaws. This animal is now considered a new species of shark that has been previously unknown to man until it's discovery in 1976. Another Megamouth shark has been caught off the Philippines on 20 Feb. 1998. This is the 11th one of these sharks to be caught since 1976.

Ogopogo

The creature that has been sighted in Canada's Lake Okanagan is known to the locals as Ogopogo. This creature is considered the Nessie of North America. The numerous sightings date back to 1850 and still continue to this day. The creature is described as a large, dark colored animal with a long neck and a humped back. In 1968, Art Folden video taped Ogopogo while it swam across the lake. In 1976, the above photo was taken of Ogopogo by Ed Fletcher of Vancouver. On that day he chased the creature up and down the lake for several hours taking pictures of it.

White River Monster

The White River runs through a town in Arkansas called Newport. From 1915 to present day the residents have reports seeing a mysterious creature in the river. The creature has been seen thrashing about in the river and is described as being 12 to 30 ft long and about 5 ft wide. Three toed tracks have also been found on the river banks. The prints measure 14 in. long and 8 in. wide. Theories on the identity of the creature range from an out of place elephant seal to a giant penguin.

New Comments from Jan Hoover who is a ichthyologist (fish biologist) "I believe that the White River Monster is a series of sightings of groups of paddlefish, combined with an occasional sighting of a large (possibly ill) sturgeon. The Monster is described as a surface dwelling, oceanic looking animal with smooth gray skin, a large mouth, and a long bone projecting from its head. Only the size is inconsistent with a paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), but paddlefish frequently occur in large groups near the surface of the water and this could be responsible for the exaggerated size. Anyway, its a much more credible candidate than a lost seal, etc., since paddlefish occur naturally in the White River."

Loch Ness Monster... Plesiosaur?

This underwater photo, taken in 1972 during the Rines expedition, seems to show a plesiosaur-like creature.

Loch Ness Monster Photo

The famous MacNab picture (below) was taken from the bend just north of the castle car park.


Proof that the Loch Ness Monster exsists!

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Bigfoot?

Kentucky Monster